3 posts tagged with "agents"

You set up three agents expecting three times the output. Instead your day looks like this: copy A's conclusion over to B, remember to chase C, read three sets of output at once, and hold "who is doing what" in your head.

More agents didn't fix the bottleneck — it moved. You no longer lack workers. You lack managers, because there's exactly one: you.

That's not a configuration problem, it's an org-structure problem. One person directly managing ten reports doesn't work in human companies either, and the fix was never "hire stronger individuals." The fix is a layer of management.

Plenty of developers already work this way: hash out the approach in Claude Code, then copy the conclusion into Codex to implement. The reason is practical, too — you're paying for both subscriptions anyway. Claude is great at planning; letting Codex do the heavy lifting doesn't burn your Claude quota. Both subscriptions earn their keep. The only problem: the "copy-paste" role in the middle is you.

In UnDercontrol, this pipeline works out of the box: Claude plans, Codex executes, and the task system is the whiteboard they share — you only step in to review at the key points.

The "agent workbench" idea is heating up. More and more people agree: an AI agent should act like a teammate — pick up tasks, report progress, leave durable output — not just answer questions in a chat box.

But there's a further question that rarely gets asked: can the AI operate the platform itself? Not just do work inside the system, but run it for you — tidy up boards, archive stale tasks, maintain tags, distill hard-won steps into a reusable capability.